click to show more information

click to hide/show information About this Show

The Ed Show

News/Business. (2013)

NETWORK

DURATION
01:00:00

RATING

SCANNED IN
San Francisco, CA, USA

SOURCE
Comcast Cable

TUNER
Virtual Ch. 787 (MSNBC HD)

VIDEO CODEC
mpeg2video

AUDIO CODEC
ac3

PIXEL WIDTH
1920

PIXEL HEIGHT
1080

TOPIC FREQUENCY

Clinton 15, Us 14, Nasa 11, Benghazi 11, Geraldo 10, Activia 8, Michael Tomasky 7, New Jersey 6, Geraldo Rivera 6, Scott Brown 5, Michelle Goldberg 5, Eugene Robinson 5, Msnbc 4, Wayne 4, New York 4, Bernie Sanders 4, Geico 4, Lunesta 3, Realtime 3, America 3,
Borrow a DVD
of this show
  MSNBC    The Ed Show    News/Business.  (2013)  

    February 1, 2013
    8:00 - 9:00pm PST  

8:00pm
advantages of immigration. >> our goal is to advance policies that make a difference in people's lives. that means we want to advance pro-growth reforms good for the economy. there are immigration things that are good for the economy. >> immigration was the first policy he talked about when he talked about pro-growth reforms. some workers, who are typically recovering, the best way to help them is with better training, better generous income tax credit, that is easier to provide in a growing economy with younger workers than in a sluggish one with budget deficits. immigration is not what hurts them, and it is not standing in the way of aiding them. in 2007, the congressional budget office found that legalizing undocumented
8:01pm
immigrants would increase revenue by $48 billion, while costing only $3 billion increased public services. and that is before you get into the broader economic benefits. there are very few free lunches in public policy. usually it is a realm of hard choices, but taking advantage of our unique position as the country with the world's best and brightest, desperately a way to go? that is surely correct. "the ed show" is up next. good evening, americans, and welcome to "the ed show" from new york. hillary clinton ends her run as secretary of state by nailing republicans for who they really are. i love it. this is "the ed show." let's get to work. >> i am very proud to have been secretary of state. >> hillary clinton gives her final farewell as secretary of state and doesn't mince parting words about the republicans refusing to face facts.
8:02pm
karen finney and michael steele on clinton's right-wing call-out. the stock market closes over 14,000. exxon has record profits, and income inequality has never been worse. senator bernie sanders on the fight ahead. scott brown is out, and geraldo is in. >> this is a real-life horror story, and it will give small children bad dreams. >> we've got rivera's first senate campaign commercial ahead. michelle goldberg, michael tomasky and gene robinson are here to talk about the legacy of statesman and mayor ed koch. beer prices could rise, but not if president obama has anything to say about it. we've got the details on the next move by the department of justice on anheuser-busch. ten years ago today, the space shuttle "columbia" tragedy rocked the country.
8:03pm
today a new shocking story of what nasa knew has america talking. we have the real story here tonight. good to have you with us tonight. folks, thanks for watching. a big thank you this evening to hk for finally saying what really needed to be said. today was clinton's final day as secretary of state. she begins her life as a private citizen tomorrow. and for now, she has nothing to lose politically. so when the associated press asked clinton about the republican lawmakers who grilled her on benghazi, this was the secretary's response. "they just will not live in an evidence-based world, and that's regrettable. it's regrettable for our political system and for the people who serve our government in very dangerous, difficult circumstances." amen to that. the president might not be able to call out republicans like this. democratic lawmakers certainly might not be able to do it, but hillary clinton has no fear of speaking the truth now that she is going to be a private citizen. her appearances in front of the
8:04pm
congressional committees on benghazi, the investigation turned into a complete sham because of these lies. the most outrageous questions came from the most ridiculous sources. take conservative blogger jennifer rubin. she managed to get an absolute falsehood presented as fact by republican lawmakers. rubin reported on a deputy secretary of state who testified about getting information from benghazi in realtime. charlene lamb said the information came from multiple phone calls to communicate with the annex in tripoli. she ended her testimony saying the other diplomats would hang up on us and then call back. rubin decided to invent details just out of thin air. she wrote, "this was the most urgent issue of the moment in which everyone wanted to know what happened in benghazi. so why not look at the realtime video?" video? there was no video.
8:05pm
all communication was done over the phone. but rubin apparently imagined a scene from the bin laden raid and then presented her imagination as fact. this is how it starts. one completely bogus and shoddy piece of writing, which makes its way over to fox news. >> oh, and did i mention the state department was watching this unfold in real-time? >> after catching fire over at fox news, it's just a quick jump away from the united states congress. >> at any time did you see the initial attack on a monitor? or the president? >> congressman, there was no monitor, there was no realtime. we got the surveillance videos some weeks later. that was the first time we saw any video of the attack. >> even after secretary clinton debunked this nonsense on camera in front of the committee, it made its way back to fox news the very same night. >> charlene lamb said they were
8:06pm
watching it at the state department in realtime. >> this is not just an isolated incident, my friends. during the same hearings, clinton was asked about a crazy conspiracy involving gun running from benghazi. it looked like this garbage started on an extreme anti-islam website claiming that ambassador chris stevens was coordinating the gun running from his outpost in benghazi. this is especially attractive to guys like glenn beck. his website picked up the theory. of course they ran with it. a headline at "the blaze" said chris stevens may have been linked to jihadist rebels in syria. how irresponsible is that? it's really scary. and here is the scary part. glenn beck's media outfit is a trusted source of secret information by at least one republican senator. here he is. rand paul had no problem repeating this total rumor and asking secretary clinton what she knew about it.
8:07pm
>> my question is, is the u.s. involved with any procuring of weapons, transfer of weapons, buying, selling, anyhow transferring weapons to turkey out of libya? >> to turkey? >> and of course the trip wouldn't be complete if the story didn't wind back up on fox news that night. >> i don't have proof of this. no one has given me any information. i have no briefing to this. but there have been articles in the news print and in the press saying that there was some gun running going on. >> all of those crazy theories and rumors serve one purpose for the people who will not live in an evidence-based society, just like hillary clinton was talking about. they make people think that there is some larger conspiracy at play. and it goes all the way to the top, the white house. well, two can play this game. you see, you can connect the dots to make things appear any way you want. i think it's only fair to
8:08pm
connect these dots to the republican party. they love to foster these conspiracies. they need to accept the consequences. republicans really should heed the lessons learned by the last gop presidential nominee. you see, mitt romney frequently relied on these nonevidence conspiracies, like the time jeep announced it would expand production in china due to great sales. >> a right wing newspaper completely butchered the story saying that jeep was considering giving up the united states and shifting production to china. enter mitt romney. >> i saw a story today that one of the great manufacturers in this state, jeep, now owned by the italians, is thinking of moving all production to china. >> there was also the lie about president barack obama never saying benghazi was an act of terrorism. >> obama knowingly lied to the american people. obama created a conspiracy theory and coordinated a
8:09pm
campaign of deceit to distract from the truth that affects our national security. >> mitt romney listened to this kind of stuff for weeks. and because he relied on this junk, he walked into the biggest trap on the largest possible stage. >> i think it's interesting the president just said something which is that on the day after the attack he went in the rose garden and said that this was an act of terror. >> that's what i said. >> you said in the rose garden the day after the attack it was an act of terror. >> no acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values we stand for. >> it was not a spontaneous demonstration? is that what you're saying? >> please proceed, governor. >> even after this, romney didn't learn. with polls showing barack obama leading on election day, romney was convinced by conservative media that he was going to win. he was shellshocked when he lost. republicans are headed down you know what? the romney path. they would do well to listen to
8:10pm
hillary clinton's advice and rejoin everyone else in the evidence-based world. get your cell phones out. i want to know what you think. tonight's question, will republicans ever live in an evidence-based world? text "a" for yes. text "b" for no to 622639. you can go to our blog at ed.msnbc.com. we'll show you the results later on in the show. joining me tonight is karen finney, msnbc political analyst and former dnc communications director, and michael steele, msnbc contributor and former chairman of the rnc. great to have both of you with us on this friday evening. michael, you first. >> good to see you, ed. >> will the republican party listen to hillary clinton? does she have merit to what she is saying? >> well, if you put it like that, ed, the answer is probably not. but i think that the underlying argument that hillary puts out there is something that we need to pay some close attention to. you know, i think the takeaway from the hearings the past week, and just looking at this from a
8:11pm
partisan political perspective was we didn't serve our interests very well. we never clarified the key questions that i thought needed to be asked. and hillary quite aptly as you showed in that clip was like, turkey? where are you getting your facts from? from the party standpoint, i get the idea of wanting to drill down on benghazi and all these issues, but we're scattered. we're all over the place. there's no cohesion, there is no current message. there is no sense of where we're leading with the questions we have, which, of course, gives opportunity for you and others to look at this and go, are you serious? i mean, here are the facts. how do you respond to the facts. and if we're responding in a direction different from the facts, you get what we have of the past few weeks. >> karen, isn't this a classic example of how something can be made up, and then they'll be called out on it later on when someone really doesn't have any political chips to lose on it. >> it is.
8:12pm
but a little bit of history. you may remember, ed, that i worked for former secretary, i guess now we would call her clinton in the white house when she was our first lady. she back then talked about the vast right-wing conspiracy, and a lot of people didn't believe her. not so much of a conspiracy anymore. we have since found out even back then, she was very correct. watching you connect those dots was quite a joy to actually have a venue where we could do that and push back on the misinformation that is out there. because this is a classic, classic thing that we've been seeing. >> and it's amazing how a blogger can put something out, it ends up in a hearing, it gets picked up by another senator who goes on a media outlet, presents it as almost fact, has the commentator saying there was actually a live feed. i'm pulling my hair out. give me a break. >> remember, there was one of the questioners also asked her about why haven't the im messages that we've subpoenaed. and later she said actually, we don't allow im at the state
8:13pm
department. >> this is a clip from chuck hagel's hearing yesterday. listen to senator james inhofe's source for his information. >> there is an article the other day in the "washington post" by jennifer rubin called "our dim witted state department." it's kind of an interesting article. >> michael, how do you get these guys to stop listening to the same wild conspiracy theories? they just live in a different world. >> i think it is a little bit of a different world in that sense. i don't get -- i don't get the direction and the messaging that the party is putting out there right now. i really honestly don't. i think that we really need to sort of step back from this thing and really assess exactly what do we need to focus on. is benghazi of all the things that are pressing the american people right now something that as a national party we should be fixated on. hillary clinton, yes, she served as secretary of state. did an admiral job. most people would say that. yeah, there was this hiccup with
8:14pm
benghazi. we unfortunately lost the lives of four u.s. servicemen out there, ambassador and the like. so how do we now deal with this in the context of everything else. >> you deal with it by dealing in facts. >> and i think that's the point, ed. i think that's the point. >> whatever happened to the day when the united states senator would pick up the phone and do his own information. senators do have their phone calls taken, okay. is this true? what do you know? and we're losing that. karen, what about that? >> well, remember also, as we learned from both the hearing with secretary clinton and then the following day with senator kerry, you had one senator who was asking secretary clinton several questions about, you know, video i believe it was and other things, and admitted that he hadn't actually gone to the briefing. so part of it is don't just go off of what you read on the internet or what somebody tells you. go to the briefing. get the information for yourself. >> in that same exchange, a senator who was not at the briefing asked john kerry if he would work with him on that.
8:15pm
well, i guess so. you didn't go to the briefing. >> it's a good start. >> ed, what i'm curious about is hillary clinton, unlike a lot of secretaries of state, had a very good working relationship inside the senate on both the right side and the left side of the aisle. so to your point about the phone call, i find it surprising and i would be curious to know if any of them did pick up the phone at that time, try to reach and talk to her directly to connect their own dots as opposed to relying on third party sources. >> you guys, let's be really clear about what this was about. benghazi, they used susan rice. they were trying to use hillary clinton to go after president obama. that's what this whole thing is about. so whether or not people went to the briefings or picked up phone calls, it was pretty obvious from the travesty that were those hearings that this was really about trying to come out with some got you information. but ultimately to go after her president that. >> is it, got you information. it would seem to me that rand paul would have picked up the phone and called secretary clinton, i don't want to make you look like a fool and i don't
8:16pm
want to look like a fool, but i just want to be very clear on this. this is what i'm going to be asking. you know what? we need to get to the truth of all this. that's really what the hearings are all about. >> and that's still out there to be discovered in many respects. there are still a lot of questions that i think were missed completely in these hearings. >> i'll let it sit there. great to have you with me. remember to answer the question at the bottom of the screen. share your thoughts on twitter and at edshow and on facebook. we want to know what you think. there was encouraging news on the economy and the stock market just going crazy, right? but income inequality, my friends, is very real. it plagues this country. and senator bernie sanders will join me to talk about it and how to remedy this whole thing. stay with us. we'll be right back. ha ha ha! no no no! not today! ha ha ha!
8:17pm
ha ha ha! jimmy how happy are folks who save hundreds of dollars switching to geico? happier than dikembe mutumbo blocking a shot. get happy. get geico. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more. i'm here with daphne oz, a model of healthy habits. so daphene, do you eat activia. i do it's always in my fridge. and you know activia isn't just for minor digestive issues. exactly, it's also important for my overall well being because it helps regulate my digestive system. and when you feel good on the inside, it shows on the outside! whether at work, with friends, on a special night, or just enjoying an activia. shine from the inside out with activia. ♪ dannon
8:18pm
big shake-up in the senate in 2014. geraldo in, scott brown out. the big panel's got it all covered for you tonight here on "the ed show." and the unbelievable story of how nasa handled the space shuttle "columbia."
8:19pm
on the tenth anniversary of the disaster, a former shuttle program manager blogged his reflections. stay with us. because what you have heard about it really is unbelievable. don't forget, you can listen to my radio show on sirius xm radio channel 127 monday through friday, noon to 3:00. share your thoughts with us on facebook and on twitter using the hash tag edshow. we're coming right back. [ dad ]. she pretty much lives in her favorite princess dress. and she's not exactly tidy. even if she gets a stain she'll wear it for a week straight. so i use tide to get out those week old stains and downy to get it fresh and soft. since i'm the one who has to do the laundry. i do what any expert dad would do. i let her play sheriff. i got 20 minutes to life. you are free to go. [ dad ] tide and downy. great on their own, even better together.
8:20pm
welcome back to "the ed show." you like numbers? i got numbers for you tonight. there is big economic news today. records are being broken. but there is still a major story of income inequality underneath all of this.
8:21pm
first, the numbers. the nation's economy added 157,000 jobs in january, and the unemployment rate, well, it ticked up to 7.9%. but the jobs numbers for both november and december were revised upwards significantly. this means more than 2 million jobs were created last year, the best number since 2005 and better than seven out of eight years in the bush/cheney era. now, the economy has now gained 5.5 million jobs out of the 8.74 million jobs lost in the great recession. we got a long way to go. no doubt about it. now, the stock market is on a roll. it topped 14,000 today for the first time since 2007. 100,000 construction jobs were added in the last four months of 2012, and today chrysler posted its highest sales in five years. and there is another side of this story, of course. millions of people are still out of work.
8:22pm
the economy actually shrank by a tenth of a point last quarter because of what? government cutbacks. 2/3 of americans are planning to delay their retirement according to "the wall street journal" because of the financial losses, income stagnation, and layoffs over the past several years. income inequality in the united states actually, folks, has gotten worse. and we now rank in the middle of latin american countries, which have historically had poor economies and high levels of income inequality. we got a lot of work to do. let's turn to senator bernie sanders of vermont. senator, great to have you with us tonight. thanks for joining us. >> good. my pleasure. >> there is still an ugly underbelly to this economy as it stands right now. this past election was themed about and focused on the middle class. what can we do, senator, moving forward here in the short-term? your thoughts. >> well, first of all, ed, we
8:23pm
have to do exactly what you are doing now and focus on an issue that gets very, very little attention. that is the fact that we have the most unequal distribution of wealth and income of any major country on earth, worse today in the united states than at any time since 1928 before the great depression. ed, from a moral perspective, moral, we have to ask ourselves whether we think it is acceptable that the top 1% owns 35% of the wealth in america when the bottom 60% owns 2.3% of the wealth. whether it is acceptable that the top 1% earns more income than the bottom 50%. and in the last study that we saw in 2010, 93%, 93% of all new income went to the top 1%. is that the kind of country that we feel comfortable living in? >> i don't think so. i don't think the american people believe that.
8:24pm
and i think that's what this election was all about. i mean, when you look at it, middle class families earned more in 1996 than today. i mean, it's absolutely amazing. the middle class are still asked to share the sacrifice with the cuts to the big three. >> that's right. >> we have to grab this conversation. >> that's exactly right. and, ed, what this is also about, it's not only morality and fairness, it is about politics. because what do you think the big money folks are doing? the big corporations who are enjoying record-breaking profits? the wealthiest people doing phenomenally well. they're not sitting on their money. they're putting huge amounts of money into the political process so they get even more tax breaks, more ability to outsource our jobs, more ability to put their money in tax havens in the cayman islands. and furthermore, it's not only a political issue and -- it is an economic issue. that is if consumers do not have the money, if the middle class and working families do not have
8:25pm
the income to spend, how are you going to create jobs? how are you going to create jobs? >> senator, your thoughts on what policies would reduce this wide gulf of income inequality? >> let me just tick off a very few. i think what almost all economists recognize is that when real unemployment is over 14%, counting those people who have given up looking for work and are working part-time, we need to invest significant sums of money rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure -- roads, bridges, water systems, mass transit, et cetera. second of all, given the threat of global warming, we need to invest very heavily and create jobs in weatherization, energy efficiency, and sustainable energy. that's one area, ed, if we are aggressive, we can create many millions of jobs rather quickly. second of all, we have got to demand that wall street stop sitting on the huge amounts of
8:26pm
money they are and get that money out to the productive economy so small and medium-sized businesses have the capital to expand and also create new jobs. >> that is a plan that needs to be discussed, and americans out to get behind. senator bernie sanders, thanks for joining us tonight. i appreciate it. coming up, geraldo rivera wants to be new jersey's next senator. we have an exclusive first look at his first campaign ad, next. and our panel will weigh in on geraldo as well as scott brown's political future. eugene brown, michael tomasky, and michelle goldberg will join me. stay tuned. you're watching "the ed show" on msnbc. we're right back.
8:27pm
have given way to sleeping. tossing and turning where sleepless nights yield to restful sleep. and lunesta®(eszopiclone) can help you get there. like it has for so many people before. when taking lunesta, don't drive or operate machinery until you feel fully awake. walking, eating, driving, or engaging in other activities while asleep, without remembering it the next day, have been reported. lunesta should not be taken together with alcohol. abnormal behaviors may include aggressiveness, agitation, hallucinations, or confusion. in depressed patients, worsening of depression, including risk of suicide, may occur. alcohol may increase these risks. allergic reactions such as tongue or throat swelling
8:28pm
occur rarely and may be fatal. side effects may include unpleasant taste, headache, dizziness, and morning drowsiness. ask your doctor if lunesta is right for you. then find out how to get lunesta for as low as fifteen dollars at lunesta.com. there's a land of restful sleep. we can help you go there on the wings of lunesta. so, i'm working on a cistern intake valve, and the guy hands me a locknut wrench. no way! i'm like, what is this, a drainpipe slipknot? wherever your business takes you, nobody keeps you on the road like progressive commercial auto. [ flo speaking japanese ] [ shouting in japanese ] we work wherever you work. now, that's progressive. call or click today.
8:29pm
8:30pm
welcome back to "the ed show." thanks for watching tonight. renowned journalist geraldo rivera made a shocking announcement today. he's actually considering running for the senate in new jersey in 2014. geraldo is considering running as a republican for senator frank lautenberg's seat. "the ed show" has obtained an exclusive copy of geraldo rivera's first campaign commercial. >> in a topsy-turvy world, with more questions than answers -- >> a massive concrete wall has been discovered. >> new jersey needs a man unafraid to suit up for battle on the greatest issues facing america. issues such as racism, satanism. >> many of the things about satanism are offensive. >> or i'm in love with a transvestite hooker.
8:31pm
>> i want to journalism school, i'm a lawyer. >> geraldo rivera is that man whom. better to clean up washington, d.c., than the man who cleaned out al capone's vault. >> it seems up to now we have struck out with the vault. i'm disappointed about that. >> a man who can reach across the aisle to find bipartisan solutions. >> what i want is fairness. >> fairness, bull! >> and a military genius, who only once gave up the position of our fighting troops in a war zone. geraldo for senate in new jersey. this is not a joke. >> this is a real-life horror story that will give small children bad dreams. >> paid for by please oh please oh please oh please oh please do this, geraldo. >> so are you going to do it? seriously. >> i very well may. >> geraldo rivera talks senate. michelle goldberg, michael tomasky, and gene robinson join our panel to talk statesmen of old and new.
8:32pm
president obama puts the department of justice to work on beer prices. new allegations arise about the tragedy of nasa's "columbia" crew. how much did mission control know? nouncer ] what are happy kids made of? bikes and balloons, wholesome noodles on spoons. a kite, a breeze, a dunk of grilled cheese. catches and throws, and spaghettio's. that's what happy kids are made of. campbell's. it's amazing what soup can do. that's what happy kids are made of. is bigger than we think ... sometimelike the flu.fer from with aches, fever and chills- the flu's a really big deal. so why treat it like it's a little cold? there's something that works differently than over-the-counter remedies. prescription tamiflu attacks the flu virus at its source. so don't wait. call your doctor right away. tamiflu is prescription medicine for treating the flu in adults and children one year and older whose flu symptoms started within the last two days.
8:33pm
before taking tamiflu tell your doctor if you're pregnant, nursing. have serious health conditions, or take other medicines. if you develop an allergic reaction, a severe rash, or signs of unusual behavior, stop taking tamiflu and call your doctor immediately. children and adolescents in particular may be at an increased risk of seizures, confusion or abnormal behavior. the most common side effects are mild to moderate nausea and vomiting. the flu comes on fast, so ask your doctor about tamiflu. prescription for flu.
8:34pm
executor of efficiency. you can spot an amateur from a mile away... while going shoeless and metal-free in seconds. and you...rent from national. because only national
8:35pm
lets you choose any car in the aisle...and go. you can even take a full-size or above, and still pay the mid-size price. now this...will work. [ male announcer ] just like you, business pro. just like you. go national. go like a pro. i am, and i've been in touch with some people in the republican party in new jersey. i am truly contemplating running for senate against frank lautenberg or cory booker. >> well, come on, geraldo. give us the audiotape of the conversation. that was geraldo rivera considering a run for a senate seat currently held by democrat frank lautenberg in the state of new jersey. let's go to our big panel tonight. msnbc political analyst eugene robinson of the "washington post." michelle goldberg and michael tomasky, both of "newsweek" and the daily beast. michael wrote this week's cover story on "newsweek." great to have all of you with us
8:36pm
tonight. well, eugene, you first. is this good news for new jersey democrats, or is it great news for new jersey democrats? >> it's great news for journalists. and so i want to know where i can write a check to the please oh please oh please oh please geraldo do this pac. because nothing but stories there. it's hard to imagine that new jersey republicans would actually nominate him. but if they did, sure. it's great news for new jersey democrats because i think they basically get a senate seat. >> chris christie's top strategist tells "the new jersey star ledger" that rivera hasn't called me. will we see governor christie giving his blessings to geraldo, a candidacy by geraldo, or is that just fat chance, michelle gold perg? what do you think? >> i would be surprised because chris christie, for all my disagreements with him, does
8:37pm
seem to love the state of new jersey. but i'm not sure how much chris christie's endorsement matters compared to fox news' endorsement. should he run, it will be just another step in the consolidation of fox news and the republican party. >> michael, you know, name recognition. he could probably raise a little bit of money. he can handle the media. he is an advocate for people in a sense. journalistic credentials a little shaky at times. would he be a potential winner, do you think? >> you know, ed, i think geraldo is a smart guy. i do his radio show sometimes, and, you know, i've talked with him. he knows issues. he knows policy. he is pretty moderate. he is pro-choice, which a lot of people may not know yet. now, that may kill him in a primary, even in new jersey. republicans around the country, republican primary electorates are pretty conservative. so that issue alone may do him in. i also remember being on his radio show once when he did this odd endorsement.
8:38pm
i think he said, i will vote for romney, but i personally support obama or something odd like that. people will have to look that up, and they will. and of course, another thing with people who have never run for office, they're going to be subjected to a new level of scrutiny. >> yeah. >> his personal finances, his personal -- you know, his personal life and so on and so forth. so all that is going to have to hold. and then the final question, can he campaign? >> well, that depends on how hard he wants to work. but he is going the al franken route. he's got the radio show all squared away early on. meanwhile, in other senate news, polling earlier this week had former senator scott brown of massachusetts actually leading democratic congressman ed markey in a hypothetical matchup to fill john kerry's senate seat. but earlier today, brown announced that he won't be entering the special election race, paving a clear path to victory for the democrats. he said something pretty interesting. "i was not at all certain that a third senate campaign in less than four years and the prospect of returning to a congress even more partisan than the one i left was really the best way for me to continue in public service
8:39pm
at this time." eugene robinson, isn't that somewhat of a surrender, that, you know, this is just a mess. why should i even deal with it? >> well, i think a lot of people kind of feel that way about congress these days and certainly feel that way about the senate, which is even more sort of paralyzed than it usually is. but scott brown, we do have to keep in mind that he lost his last campaign for senate, and he might have been making a calculation there. polls were showing him ahead. but there is no guarantees, and it would be his third campaign. so why go through it again? >> michelle, this leaves the republican party in massachusetts kind of scrambling right now, doesn't it? >> that's what is so interesting, i think, is that they have essentially no one. i mean, it's amazing to have kind of a major political party with a bench with basically nobody sitting on it. i mean, one name that i've seen floated is william weld, who -- i mean, it would be fascinating to have somebody who was a
8:40pm
republican who was an outspokenly pro-choice politician. but i can't imagine him -- i can't imagine him winning. and it's hard to imagine him as part of the kind of contemporary senate republican caucus. this is just further evidence of the complete collapse of old school northeastern republicanism. >> along those lines, michael, you know, there is one guy that still has got a lot of time on his hand. his name is mitt romney. >> yes, there is. there is also a guy named tagg romney. maybe it's time to pass the torch to the next generation. look, in addition to all the reasons already put forward or all the explanations already put forward, i think this is a tea party setback. brown as a senator, as a voting senator, didn't always vote with the tea party by any stretch of the imagination. but he was a tea party darling in a big way in 2010. >> yeah, he was. >> in a big way. and so now he's gone. and it's just another setback
8:41pm
for that wing of the republican party and that movement. and as everyone says, it's pretty clearly going to be a democratic seat. >> we all know this man was larger than life. a man with keen political instincts. ov all, he was a new yorker. former new york city mayor ed koch died early this morning of congestive heart failure. he was 88 years old. after serving in congress, mayor koch was elected to three times in city hall from 1978 to 1989. koch never married and had no children, but as his "new york times" obituary put it, he was survived by new york itself. koch liked to ask people, you know, how am i doing? eugene robinson, what's his legacy? >> well, as a practical matter, he improved the city's finances tremendously. but really what he did was personify the city, in my view, at a time when it could use that
8:42pm
sort of larger-than-life figure. and he kind of -- his ebullience and determination and drive i think gave a boost in and of themselves to a city that was in pretty bad shape. >> michelle, this was a man who was not afraid to infuriate liberals. >> yeah. i think he seemed to delight in it. in some ways he was kind of the prototypical neoconservative, somebody who started on the left, who started out very liberal, and then made his political career being tough on crime, being kind of insensitive to minorities, and then later on being sometimes crazily islamophobic and really vicious to anybody who disagreed with the likud line on israel. >> is new york a better place, michael tomasky, because ed koch was the mayor and served for so
8:43pm
long? >> generally speaking, yes. i'll add this point. i knew ed, and i covered ed. i lived in new york in those days. and this is one part of his legacy that doesn't get mentioned as much, and it's a good part. he undertook in the 1980s a $5.2 billion housing program for the city. and people who ride say the number 6 train up through the bronx, up westchester avenue, and you look out and you see all that housing, still pretty new, from the 1980s, that was koch's housing program, and a whole lot else besides. so that was one very good thing he did. you know, he was a combustible guy, and a lot of people really didn't like him. but on balance he did more good for the city for sure. >> in our final topic tonight, have any of you figured out just how close john mccain and chuck hagel actually are? i mean, are they really good buddies, eugene robinson? >> it's a bromance, a bromance for the ages. >> okay, is that what that is? i tell you what? who needs enemies with friends like that? i think, michael tomasky, i think that chuck hagel was just
8:44pm
taken by it all. >> yeah, well, he was something. you know, i hope he is better prepared for the issues he is going to face as secretary of defense than he was for those questions. >> i think stunned would be the right word. eugene robinson, michelle goldberg, michael tomasky, great to have you with us tonight. thanks for joining us on "the ed show." coming up, be sure to enjoy your beer this super bowl sunday, because next year it could cost a little bit more. actually, a whole lot more. but not if president obama and the justice department have anything to do with it. stay tuned. we're right back. itch to swiffe, and you'll dump your old mop. but don't worry, he'll find someone else. ♪ who's that lady? ♪ who's that lady? ♪ sexy lady ♪ who's that lady? [ female announcer ] used mops can grow bacteria. swiffer wetjet starts with a clean pad every time, and its antibacterial cleaner kills bacteria mops can spread around. swiffer gives cleaning a whole new meaning. ♪ lovely lady
8:45pm
hillary clinton officially stepped down today as secretary of state. but many of you on our facebook and twitter believe she'll be back. on facebook, stephanie writes hillary, you were and are a true inspiration to all. look forward to voting for you as president in 2016. steve brown writes such grace, ease, and dignity, and hillary, see you in 2016. and william says hk would be a
8:46pm
great follow-up to barack obama as president in 2016. just think, bill clinton as first gentleman. go to our facebook page right now and get in on the conversation. and don't forget to like "the ed show" when you're there, folks. we'd appreciate that. still to come, a former nasa employee's blog about the space shuttle "columbia" disaster has everyone talking. we'll get to the bottom of this unbelievable story ahead. stay tuned. in that time there've been some good days. and some difficult ones. but, through it all, we've persevered, supporting some of the biggest ideas in modern history. so why should our anniversary matter to you? because for 200 years, we've been helping ideas move from ambition to achievement. and the next great idea could be yours. ♪
8:47pm
humans. even when we cross our t's and dot our i's, we still run into problems. namely, other humans. which is why at liberty mutual insurance, auto policies come with new car replacement and accident forgiveness if you qualify. see what else comes standard at libertymutual.com. liberty mutual insurance. responsibility. what's your policy?
8:48pm
welcome back to "the ed show". be honest, president obama is the kind of guy that you'd probably want to have a beer with. at least i think that. in his first term, president obama held beer summit, shared a beer with a medal of honor winner, knocked back a couple of cool ones with constituents on the campaign trail. heck, under obama, the white house began brewing its own beer that was so popular that a freedom of information act was submitted just to get the recipe.
8:49pm
i'm guessing that on super bowl sunday the president will join americans as they consume millions of cases of beer on, of course, the big day for the big game. but in the meantime, president obama is looking out for you to make sure that next year you don't have to pay more for that six-pack. you see, on thursday the justice department filed a civil antitrust lawsuit to block a merger between two beer industry giants. the lawsuit challenges anheuser-busch inbev's attempt to buy 50% of mexico's grupo modelo that it doesn't already own. abi is the ruler of the u.s. beer market, no doubt. modelo is ranked third. the justice department believes that the merger could create a beer monopoly. if a abi buys their direct competitor, it could easily change market forces and raise the prices of beer everywhere. it's estimated that if the deal goes through, a six-pack could
8:50pm
end up costing 25 to 50 cents more. sure, now that doesn't sound like a whole heck of a lot. but when you start adding it up, it could cost beer drinkers in this country billions of dollars. now, they haven't gone after wall street, but when you crack open that cool one on super bowl sunday, know that the president of the united states and the justice department, well, i tell you what, they are looking out for you. four more beers. and as for the game, i'm just not high on this one, the 49ers and the ravens. i've been mad at baltimore ever since the colts left. i grew up thinking johnny unitas was the greatest of all time. when the colts left i never paid attention baltimore. and then when the 49ers' bill walsh and montana and all that crowd, i just thought they won too much. they were awful good, though. i just can't warm up to san francisco this year because of the way they trashed their first quarterback, even though the guy they got in there right now is really entertaining and good. and then this two brothers thing into the super bowl.
8:51pm
i'm still mad the vikings aren't there. must be a conspiracy there or something. anyway, tonight in the survey, i asked you will republicans ever live in an evidence-based world? 2% of you say yes. 98% of you say no. coming up, stunning new details about the space shuttle "columbia" disaster. the nasa manager in charge admits what really went wrong ten years ago. find out what he regrets most, when we come back. stay with us. i'm here with daphne oz, a model of healthy habits.
8:52pm
so daphene, do you eat activia. i do it's always in my fridge. and you know activia isn't just for minor digestive issues. exactly, it's also important for my overall well being because it helps regulate my digestive system. and when you feel good on the inside, it shows on the outside! whether at work, with friends, on a special night, or just enjoying an activia. shine from the inside out with activia. ♪ dannon
8:53pm
8:54pm
all right that's a fifth-floor probleok.. not in my house! ha ha ha! ha ha ha! no no no! not today! ha ha ha! ha ha ha! jimmy how happy are folks who save hundreds of dollars switching to geico? happier than dikembe mutumbo blocking a shot. get happy. get geico. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more.
8:55pm
and in tonight's big finish, there is a story making the rounds on some news sites that shocked my staff and got all of us talking today. the headlines say nasa knew the space shuttle "columbia" was doomed, but decided not to tell the astronauts. the story is loosely based on a blog post by a former nasa flight manager. the story is sensational, but it's not really true. the stunning claim comes on the tenth anniversary of the "columbia" disaster. nasa held this remembrance service in california for all astronauts killed over the years. the fate of the "columbia" members was sealed january 16th, 2003. >> three, two, one. we have booster ignition and liftoff of space shuttle "columbia." >> from the ground, this looked like a perfect launch. but close-up video showed a chunk of debris slamming into the shuttle's left wing. no one was sure how bad the
8:56pm
damage was, and they believed they couldn't do anything about it. mission control discussed hypotheticals. former flight director wayne hale quoted a colleague saying i think the crew would rather not know. don't you think it would be better for them to have a happy, successful flight and die unexpectedly during reentry than to stay on orbit, knowing that there was nothing to be done until the air ran out? but hale told us today no one believed the mission would end like this. the shuttle disintegrated 16 days after it launched, killing all seven members and raining debris over texas. president george w. bush ended the shuttle program two years later. hale told me, our staff today i should say, that there was no concern for reentry. the crew was given a summary of the issue with the conclusion of no concern. hale says nasa told crew everything, but everyone agreed there was nothing they could do about the damage.
8:57pm
hale says that's the tragic lesson of the "columbia" disaster. quote, we will never again say that there is nothing we can do. i'm joined by nbc news space analyst james oberg. mr. oberg, great to have you with us here tonight on "the ed show." >> good evening, ed. >> good evening to you, sir. >> i know wayne, because wayne and i trained together on the first shuttle flights 32 years ago. so when he talks, we listen. and he made some comments that as you explained did get taken in the wrong direction. but it didn't get to the actually most serious question, which is why didn't they know the shuttle was damaged? did they deliberately or unconsciously not look very hard? and why were they caught by surprise? >> would nasa ever keep vital information from a crew during a mission? >> everyone i've talked to and my own experience in mission control is no, because if you start doing that, you start
8:58pm
developing a distrust between the ground and people in space, and that communications barrier leads -- will lead to all sorts of trouble. all this conversation was in the hall after they had already decided there was no danger. but the decision was wrong, as hale points out. and what wayne was objecting to, what wayne was regretting was not slapping this guy down right away saying that was crazy. he didn't do it. it turned out he didn't have to because they never would have told. they never felt it was lost. but they missed the chance to find the mistake. they missed the chance to at least go down swinging, go down fighting. trying to fix the hole, trying to get a rescue ship up, trying to get international aid to resupply the shuttle. all those things would have been at least tried. whether they worked or not, we still don't know. but dying out of nowhere, totally out of left field, blindsided by reality, that's a way no one really wants to go.
8:59pm
>> mr. oberg, how much have we learned from this tragedy in your opinion? >> ed, what we have learned, unfortunately, what philosopher hegel said is "all we learn from history is we don't learn from history." the biggest tragedy of this disaster and some of the earlier ones was it taught nasa nothing that they hadn't already learned during apollo and other projects and had forgotten, or had overlooked or had gotten off target. so a lot of the safety issues -- space flight is unforgiving. it's inherently dangerous if you're careless. if you get careless, it will kill you. more so than most other activities on earth, especially maybe underwater caving. but it's dangerous. and if you get slipshod, even if